The Batek experiences with globalization, which bring violence and the fear of violence into their lives, have prompted many to move out of their forests into sedentary villages. In a journal article released a few months ago, Ivan Tacey carefully explains why global economic, social, cultural, and religious forces are so destructive to the Batek, and how their belief systems are coping.

oil palm plantationThe author, who has done fieldwork among the Batek as recently as 2012, argues that many problems might superficially be seen as Malaysian issues, such as the conversion of vast tracts of rainforest into oil palm plantations, but they are really responses to globalizing trends. He explores the complexities of globalization in considerable detail, so this review can only touch on a few of his points.

He explains how violent and terrifying many of the global forces really are. For instance, aggressive attempts by Muslim missionaries to convert the Batek have sometimes been highly threatening. If everyone in this village does not accept Islam they will all be murdered, some missionaries told one Orang Asli (aboriginal) village in the 1990s. These threats simply reinforced memories from 70 years earlier when they were literally carried out—entire communities were slaughtered by Muslim fanatics for their refusal to give up their pagan ways and convert.

Other threats are less dramatic, but just as troubling to the Batek and to the other Orang Asli. The state confiscates forest lands that have been occupied and used by the Batek for millennia for other uses that seem more productive, such as mining, logging, or oil palm plantations. This state-backed process is always predicated on the threat of violence. To avoid such violence, the state pressures the indigenous people to move out of the forests into resettlement camps. The state and federal governments are stubbornly opposed to granting land rights to the Batek, or the other groups.

However, Tacey does point out that the Batek should not be seen as completely passive victims of state repression and outsider violence. Some communities are preparing formal complaints and statements to powerful agencies, such as the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, several NGOs, and departments of the Malaysian government.

This is a common thread from numerous other news stories in this website—reports of societies with highly peaceful traditions that nonetheless are willing to take positive, though still quite nonviolent, actions to address the injustices heaped on them. The G/wi of the Kalahari repeatedly have taken their aggressive national government to court; the Semai have honored a woman leader who spearheads peaceful protests; the Paliyan joined a protest march for indigenous rights rather than fleeing into the forest as they used to do. It is good to learn that the Batek are also taking actions against their oppressors.

Tacey argues that the Batek deal with the various destructive, or potentially harmful, forces they face with what he calls “tropes of fear.” He defines tropes as figurative ideas that are at the center of issues and that ground people’s conceptions of realities and how to deal with them. A central cause of fright for the Batek is the fear of gob, the outsider: the aggressive Malay, the noisy tourist, the destructive corporation.

He emphasizes that the focus of Batek life and society is the forest—a life from which many have now been separated by miles of oil palm plantations. The forest is not simply where people go for good food and pure water. It is where their ancestors reside, a place filled with meanings for everyone. Their religious beliefs are intricately tied in with their forest—or former forest—environment.

Gobar, the thunder spirit, enforces socio-religious rules through taboos about hunting, diets, and social norms. Violations of those rules, such as a display of violence or even anger, could provoke Gobar into sending a thunderstorm that might cause enough flooding to wipe out a community. As an example of evocative, and often fascinating, prose, the author writes, “The Batek see Gobar as a physically indescribable, incredibly powerful, vengeful, but often stupid force living somewhere in the sky, who unleashes his fury in the form of terrifying storms when any taboos are broken (p.246).”

Compelling reading. But the analysis is also quite engaging, particularly the parts about how the Batek relate their contemporary lives to the realities of the rest of the world. For many are now living in settled communities, have day laboring jobs, and own motorbikes and televisions. Even those who are still living in the forest have access to a TV from time to time when they visit people in permanent homes. They are increasingly aware of the problems of the world, but they tend to frame them in their own terms.

While one might expect the Batek to see the logging and destruction of forests as the cause of Gobar’s anger, which has resulted in floods over much of Malaysia, other consequences of human meddling with nature are more surprising. When they learned about the destruction of New York by superstorm Sandy late in the autumn of 2012, the Batek blamed that event on U.S. actions that angered the gods—perhaps the violence that occurs in the United States itself, or aggression by the U.S. against other countries.

In essence, the wrath of Gobar is no longer confined to local conditions, local violations of taboos, or local upsets in the moral and social order at the rainforest campsite. Globalization of information apparently prompts Gobar to take a universal view of his prohibitions against the destruction of nature and any sort of violence or warfare. The deities are clearly willing to extend their preference for peacefulness to all of humanity, not just to the Batek.

Tacey extends his analysis of the tropes of fear to several other aspects of Batek life, only a few of which can be mentioned. For instance, the Batek love not only the forest and its animal and plant life, they also love the coolness that pervades it. Because the land becomes unnaturally hot when it is logged, they see a deforested landscape as sick, like the body of a human being afflicted with illness. They thus think of global warming as a sickness of the earth, and tie it in with Gobar and his anger at human desecration.

The author provides interesting details about the ways the Batek living in villages stubbornly hide their refusal to become good Muslins from their Malay neighbors. They have to surreptitiously sneak off into forested areas to gather and hunt and be part of the natural world they so cherish.

The best part of this fascinating article is that it is easily available, and free of charge, as a PDF. Highly recommended as an exploration of the ways a peaceful society is struggling to retain its nonviolent worldview.

Tacey, Ivan. 2013. “Tropes of Fear: The Impact of Globalization on Batek Religious Landscapes” Religions 4(2): 240-261

The Supreme Court of France recently struck down two laws passed in French Polynesia because some of the debates in the territorial assembly were held in the Tahitian language. In response, ­Édouard Fritch, the President of the Territorial Assembly, asked the President of France if he would support amending French laws to allow Tahitian to be accepted as a second language in the territory. It is, after all, the native tongue of the Tahitian people.

Edouard FritchMr. Fritch pointed out that the debates in the assembly are translated simultaneously, and that records of proceedings are maintained in the French language. He argued that changing the laws in France would guarantee that the people of the territory could use their Tahitian.

In striking down the local laws, the court in France did acknowledge that Tahitian was, in fact, recognized as a major local language in French Polynesia, and its use is an important way for the people to maintain their diversity and identity within the territory. It said that regional languages support the French heritage.

Students of peacefulness in Tahiti, who are interested in the arguments of Mr. Fritch, should consult Robert I. Levy’s masterpiece Tahitians: Mind and Experience in the Society Islands (1973). Levy makes the importance of the Tahitian language quite clear. Probably the foremost scholar to study rural areas of the Society Islands, the anthropologist devoted a lot of space in the book to his ethnopsychological analyses of the meanings of Tahitian language terms.

Some of them relate directly to the development of their peaceful ethos. For instance, he writes that their word here, love, has somewhat different connotations from the English word “love.” It emphasizes active beliefs and actions as the essence of a heterosexual relationship. The word suggests that the couple wants to do things together, with both their minds and their bodies.

When a man is caught in a situation where he has to eat a meal away from his partner, the implication of here is that he wants to take food back to her. On the contrary, a man who only has a physical desire for a woman, even if he lives with her, does not properly have a feeling of here for her, unless the totality of his thinking is focused on her. Here is clearly different from the desire for sex. The word also is used for parent-child, sibling, and friendship relationships, as it relates not so much to intentions as to actions and actual caring behavior.

Levy describes his lengthy discussions of this word with his Tahitian informants. Manu, for instance, explains that both he and his partner, Tetua, here each other, which makes their relationship so effective. If they didn’t share this kind of affection, their relationship would founder. “But the way it is, she heres and I here, and that’s that. When things are like that, life goes properly for a couple (p.318).”

The book describes numerous other Tahitian words and concepts, several of which also helped foster Tahitian peacefulness, at least during the early 1960s when he did his field work there. In sum, the preservation and use of the Tahitian language is clearly more than just a symbol of local pride or nationalism. It is also a vehicle for maintaining the ideals of nonviolence.

The CBC reported last week that the design of a massive new research facility, to be located in the Nunavut community of Cambridge Bay, will be based on traditional Inuit culture and knowledge.

Canadian High Arctic Research StationAlain Fournier, an architect from Montreal, told the community that designers of the very large Canadian High Arctic Research Station, CHARS, studied every aspect of Inuit philosophy and culture during the design process. “It’s more than just token, hanging cultural elements here, cultural elements there,” he said. “It’s really trying to delve as deeply as we can into the sources of culture. This is not an ivory tower. It’s a research station that intends to be welcoming and open.”

The detailed plans for the new building are shown on the facility page of the CHARS website. As the CBC summarizes it, visitors will be welcomed by an outdoor entrance structure that resembles a Qaggiq, a huge, communal igloo. Inside, a public space will welcome researchers as well as visitors to stop and have some tea.

The grounds in Cambridge Bay will include several buildings in addition to the main research facility, including a field house, a maintenance building, and a dorm for scientists. The environmentally-friendly buildings will have solar panels along the southern faces and will have composting toilets.

One of the Inuit traditions that the architects included is that the main entrances will be placed so that they will be scoured by the winds, to retard the accumulation of snow. “It’s common sense, but it’s common sense based on tradition,” Mr. Fournier said.

Cambridge Bay residents seemed to appreciate the acknowledgement of their traditions. Bernice Lyall commented, “having traditional knowledge incorporated in the facility is the most important thing. For youth, it will be an opportunity of identity, [to] know who they are.”

The main CHARS website states the mission of the new facility: “To be a world-class research station in Canada’s Arctic that is on the cutting edge of Arctic issues. The Station will anchor a strong research presence in Canada’s Arctic that serves Canada and the world. It will advance Canada’s knowledge of the Arctic in order to improve economic opportunities, environmental stewardship, and the quality of life of Northerners and all Canadians.” CHARS is expected to be under construction by 2014 and completed and open by 2017.

The website states that CHARS will be a year-round facility that fosters relevant science and technology relating to Arctic concerns. It will function as the center for a network of research stations dedicated to Arctic investigations. The original government mandate from 2007 stated clearly that part of the reason for the development is to strengthen “Canada’s sovereignty and place in the world.” The website points out that one of the priorities for the facility is the “efficient and effective monitoring and surveillance of Canada’s vast Arctic.”

But science is clearly at the core of the endeavor. CHARS will foster interdisciplinary investigations in the natural and physical sciences, economics, the social sciences, life sciences, health, engineering, technology, and the humanities. It will promote education and outreach as well as the actual scientific research.

The CHARS website describes more than just the overall mission and objectives of the facility. It also provides details of the innumerable meetings and processes that have gone into the careful development of the project. The release of plans for the buildings last week comes after six years of effort, and will lead, in four more, to their completion.

The website provides more details about the public meetings held June 10 – 12 in Cambridge Bay. It indicates that the design is still under development, and that the architects are hoping for further feedback from the community. The design, it indicates, is informed by the concept of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, the local term for traditional knowledge.

The planned facility will cost $142 million (Canadian).

The Economic Times, a publication associated with the Times of India, published an update last week about the proposed Mayel Lyang Lepcha Development Board. The new board, intended to foster the health, education, and economic development of the Lepcha people, was proposed by the Chief Minister of India’s West Bengal State, Mamata Banerjee, back in January 2013, and approved by the state cabinet on February 5.

Mamata BanerjeeThe January proposal by the Chief Minister prompted outrage by the Gorkha people, a more aggressive society of northern India that has a lot more power and influence in the Darjeeling Hills along the border with Sikkim than the Lepchas. News stories in January and early February reported intense anger on the part of the Gorkhas—and a lot of hope among the Lepchas.

The Indigenous Lepcha Tribal Association did not want to make a comment for reporters back in February when the relations were especially sour, but last week the ILTA has been speaking out. According to the Economic Times, Mr. L. S. Tamchang, the President of ILTA, announced that the group will celebrate the second anniversary of the formation of the MLLDB on September 2, 2013. Numerous news accounts, however, agree that the MLLDB was first proposed this last January 31st.

Be that as it may, Mr. Tamchang expressed his appreciation for the support of the Chief Minister. “This was the first time, with [the] formation of MLLDB, [that] this Government has given us true recognition as well as a feeling of freedom. We are thankful for that,” he said. He has had numerous meetings with Ms. Banerjee recently.

The Economic Times reports that the MLLDB has still not been officially constituted, however, a fact confirmed by Mr. Bhupendra Lepcha, the Secretary of the ILTA.

The reporter spoke with leaders of both the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration, a quasi-governmental organization, and Lepcha leaders about the creation of the MLLDB. Neither side could clarify how they expected trouble to be avoided between the GTA and the proposed Lepcha development body, if and when it is officially created.

Political observers are suspecting that the maneuver by the state, and the alienation of the Gorkhas by the Chief Minister, may yet secure for her party, the All India Trinamool Congress, many votes from Lepcha constituents in elections scheduled for 2014. However, said one observer, “this may erode harmony between the two hilly communities, Gorkhas and Lepchas, which will be a great loss in [the] long run.”

Last week a guest blogger for the Christian Science Monitor reported that Ohio Amish farmers are being cheated by Marcellus shale fracking companies, which know that they will not sue them for fraud.

Holmes County CourthouseJames Burgess, the Monitor blogger, cited an earlier report in the New Republic that discussed the story of Lloyd Miller, an Amish farmer near Millersburg, in eastern Ohio’s Holmes County. Mr. Miller was contacted by an agent from the energy drilling company Kenoil. The agent offered the farmer $10 per acre for a drilling lease, telling him that that was the going rate in the area. The farmer talked it over with his wife and since they own 150 acres, they were quite tempted.

They needed the money so they signed. Then, they learned that the going rate in their area is $1,000 per acre. Mr. Miller talked with an attorney, who told him that the statement by the agent, that $10.00 per acre was the going local rate, was fraudulent. The farmer had a good case for suing the company in court. The difficulty was that taking someone to court in Holmes County would be contrary to Amish beliefs.

Mr. Burgess suggests that one might blame the Amish for not checking up on the facts themselves before signing leases. The problem is that the energy companies deceive the Amish landowners by showing them out-of-date leases when they make their fraudulent pitches to unsuspecting farm families. A local Ohio law firm contacted several Amish families, and all reported that the energy companies had duped them too.

Grist, an environmental news and commentary website, analyzed the New Republic story a few days earlier than the Monitor did. The Grist reporter, Claire Thompson, quoted some of the same New Republic assertions that the Monitor did, though in a bit more detail.

The Amish refuse to take the fracking companies to court, Ms. Thompson emphasizes, because of comments by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. They accept literally his statement that one must turn the other cheek. If a man is sued for his coat, he should give his cloak also. The Amish interpret those statements to mean that they should not try to redress wrongs committed against them in the courts.

And the nasty implication of this, according to Ms. Thompson, is that the fracking companies are well aware of the Amish predicament. They can cheat them and not worry about being sued. Amish peacefulness, in other words, may have severe costs at times.

Some Amish bishops are suggesting that members of their districts can go into court, with the help of attorneys, and ask for declaratory judgments by judges, who will interpret contracts. There are no monetary judgments, but even so, many Amish are not comfortable with that possibility. Ms. Thompson suggests that the best remedy is for the word to get around to all members of the Amish community to be more careful of the fracking agents.

One feature of the Grist story is that it provides a link to the original New Republic article, written by Molly Redden, published on their website on June 6th, and available for free access. The full story provides lots of interesting additional details. For instance, when Mr. Miller, the Amish farmer, was told by the attorney that he could take Kenoil to court, he replied quickly that that is something they just don’t do. And what about the agent? “He’s got to live with his conscience,” Miller replied.

Ms. Reddon, in discussing the Amish reluctance to take opponents to court, referred to a 2011 case when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged a local Amish man, Monroe L. Beachy, with running a Ponzi scheme that had bilked many investors out of some $17 million—a smaller version of the famed Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme. A committee representing about 2,500 Amish creditors requested the judge to dismiss the case against Mr. Beachy in order to allow them to divide up the debts among themselves.

The New Republic article does discuss one example of a case in which an Amish farm couple, Levi and Mary Yoder, did, in fact, sue a gas company, Columbia Gas. The couple charged that the company had drilled illegally on their land and cheated them out of $750,000 worth of gas.

The judge found in their favor, and ordered the company to pay the Amish couple $900,000. He increased the award because, after the couple filed the suit, the company had approached the local Amish bishop, urging him to talk to the Yoders and remind them of their prohibition against court actions. The company was, in essence, trying to use Amish religious beliefs to its own advantage. Ms. Reddon also discussed the issue with an attorney for Columbia Gas, who offered a very different explanation for his company’s actions.

Ms. Reddon explores the ramifications of other contract problems between Amish farmers in Ohio and gas drilling companies. One farmer tried to block any further drilling on his property by buying an old, existing well on his land. However, two national energy companies, Devon Energy and EnerVest, quickly moved to block his effort. They knew that they would win, since they were well aware that the Amish normally don’t sue anyone.

Attorneys in eastern Ohio reported to Ms. Reddon that the Amish do come into their offices on occasion and complain about both civil and criminal wrongs committed against them. One told the New Republic that he had had Amish people forgiving five figure debts, rather than attempting to collect those amounts in court. Another said he recalled Amish people avoiding court even in criminal cases. An Amish man had been horsewhipped by some burglars in his home, but he refused to press criminal charges.

When she was finishing her interview with Lloyd Miller, Ms. Reddon asked him if he were envious of his neighbors, who were able to sue the gas companies when they cheat them. Mr. Miller looked out the window for a moment and replied, “basically, you have to laugh it off, because it will spoil every day you wake up.”

As peaceful as some Inuit groups may once have been, today they experience incredibly high rates of suicides—partly caused by childhood abuses, according to a recent study. The study was released last Wednesday at a news conference in Iqaluit and discussed on the website of the Canadian Medical Association Journal, where it is the first of four articles on the subject.

Cathy TowtongieCathy Towtongie, who is the president of Nunavut Tunngavik, an organization that promotes the social, cultural, and economic well-being of the Inuit, said at the news conference, “this study provides us with a clearer understanding of the reasoning behind suicide. It’s my hope that it will lead to a better understanding of suicide and allow for a better prevention of suicide in the future.”

The study, prepared by researchers from two groups at McGill University in Montreal—the McGill Group for Suicide Studies and the Douglas Mental Health University Institute—is titled “Qaujivallianiq Inuusirijauvalauqtunik, Learning from Lives that Have Been Lived.”

The importance of the study of 120 Inuit who had committed suicides, and of a comparable control group of 120 Inuit who had not taken their lives, is its in-depth analysis of what happened during the victims’ lives that might have prompted their deaths.

The statistics on Inuit suicides quoted by one of the authors of the study are overwhelming. Suicides in Nunavut among the Inuit are about 10 times that of the rest of the Canadian population, about 110 deaths per 100,000 people, compared to 11 per 100,000 for the rest of Canada. Among young males, the figure is far worse—500 per 100,000—almost 50 times the national average. And it gets worse. In 2012, 27 Inuit in Nunavut committed suicide. Less than halfway through 2013, there have already been 21, an incredible jump for a territorial population of only about 34,000.

To do their investigation, the researchers studied RCMP and medical records of the 120 people who had committed suicides from 2003 through 2006. The investigators identified two major factors that put Inuit people, especially the youth, at risk of suicide: mental illnesses, and childhood sexual and physical assaults.

Dr. Eduardo Chachamovich, an assistant professor and psychiatrist at McGill and a co-author of the report, indicated that 54 percent of the suicide group suffered from major depressive disorder in the six months before they took their own lives, compared with only 8.3 percent of the Inuit control group.

Earlier in their lives, 61 percent of the suicide group had experienced depressive disorder, compared to 24 percent of the control group. Both numbers are far higher than the Canadian average of 8 percent of the population who have experienced a major depression at some point.

The study also found a strong association between people who had committed suicide and their experiences of childhood sexual, emotional, and physical abuse. Almost half had been abused during childhood, compared to less than a third among the control group. Looking specifically at sexual abuse, 15.8 percent of the suicide group experienced that form of violence, compared to 6.7 percent of the control group. For physical abuse, the comparison was 21 percent of the suicide group and 13.3 percent of the control.

Natan Obed, an official with Nunavut Tunngavik, said that “the link between childhood sexual and physical abuse and over-arching risk for suicide is something that is very pronounced in the study and it reinforces our concern about these topics.” He added, “we don’t feel we can make huge strides on suicide prevention or a host of other mental health conditions unless we do more to ensure that children are growing up in safe and healthy environments.”

Obed and Chachamovich both expressed grave concerns about the abuse figures. A Canadian Auditor General’s report in 2011 showed that sexual assaults on children in Nunavut were 10 times the Canadian average—44.3 incidents per 100,000 people, compared to 4.3 per 100,000 in the rest of the country.

Obed argued that Nunavut needs a lot more financial support from the federal government to help the territory combat abuses of children and the subsequent suicides of the victims. Chachamovich made a similar point. “If we had those figures anywhere in the south, it would be a major crisis. People would be talking about it every day in the papers, on the streets. There would be a big outcry for more resources and more help.”

The professor added that Nunavut has no psychiatrists, and many permanent communities don’t even have a family doctor. Psychiatrists and doctors visit some communities only sporadically. He argued that aggressive and consistent delivery of suicide prevention programs is necessary in order to bring the rates down. The numbers are clear, he maintains.

Interviewed by CMAJ in Montreal, Chachamovich concluded, “the model of health professionals waiting for people to come and talk to them about whatever is happening—a passive model— … doesn’t work up there [in Nunavut]. You have to have an active model where you go and reach people.”

Nine Birhor teenagers, who were ignored by government bureaucrats despite their having gotten educations, have been admitted to the Industrial Training Institute of the Bokaro Steel, Limited, (BSL) plant. The boys made the news about six weeks ago when they began protesting the way they were being treated.

Bokaro SteelThey had passed their Class XII examinations at the special school set up by BSL, and had waited many months for jobs promised repeatedly by district government officials. But they had still not gotten the positions. They had been forced to return to their village and take up laboring jobs instead.

The company, which has not been shy about publicizing its corporate social responsibility to the Bokaro District of India’s Jharkhand state, has decided to continue to support the cause that it started, despite the attitude of the district government.

The CEO of BSL, Anutosh Maitra, met with the boys last week to offer them technical training for future employment at the steel plant itself. He urged them to make good use of the opportunity the company was providing for them.

The boys will receive a two-month orientation to the curriculum of the technical institute. Then, starting in August, they will be enrolled for a 12 month program of technical training. Throughout the training period, each will receive a monthly stipend of Rs 2500 (US$43.80). While they were working as day laborers, they were making only Rs. 70 per day.

They will also be given rooms during the training period. Once the training programs are completed, they will be moved into positions where they will continue to receive on the job training to further their skills.

The Eurasia Review last week analyzed the effects that increasing tourism and military deployments in northern India are having on the traditional Ladakhi way of life. Widening economic gaps between rural Ladakhis and urbanites in Leh, the regional capital, are one of the problems the article identifies.

Leh marketTraditional agriculture, as described by Norberg-Hodge, Mann, and other writers, has been the essence of the economy and social structure for centuries. People lived in small communities growing crops and storing foods for the long winters. However, the advent of tourism, starting in 1975, began to change their traditions, as farmers had to adjust crops to meet new demands.

The opening of Ladakh brought not only tourists but consumer goods, imported foods, western educations, and the global media. Ladakhis gained romanticized impressions of the outside world from brief encounters with tourists, while their attitudes were changed by access to the media.

Ladakhis living in many areas of the region to this day have little contact with the tourist industry. Developments and changes are occurring in areas where the tourists visit but not in the rest of the region. As a result, people from those other areas are moving into Leh and vicinity for employment, thus reducing the numbers of people involved with farming. Ladakhis in Leh are competing with one another for scarce jobs.

The increasing presence of the Indian Army in the region has also had an impact on Ladakh’s economy. The army employs large numbers of people to raise food, work on roads, and provide porter services. It supports hospitals, schools, and computer centers. In the Nubra Valley, to the north of Leh, young people leave their farms to work for the army, then drift into Leh to spend their earnings.

Previously, the army bases were concentrated along the border areas with Pakistan and China, but today they are spread widely throughout Ladakh. They are even in the Zanskar Valley, in southwestern Ladakh, fairly distant from the border regions.

The article last week in the Eurasia Review takes up the call of economic localism, an idea advocated by Norberg-Hodge, who proposes that everyone will benefit from relying as much as possible on locally-raised foods and products. That way, the imbalances caused by the consumption of external goods will be redressed, at least to some extent.

The article also suggests that Ladakhis should explore alternative forms of traditional agricultural production—such as growing fruits, exotic vegetables, herbs, and flowers. The author is confident that agriculture will remain a stable, long term basis of the Ladakhi economy, despite the fact that tourism, army employment, and government jobs will not go away.

However, educated young people are increasingly apathetic toward agricultural work. The changes brought about by the opening to the outside world can’t be reversed, but the author urges the Ladakhi people to preserve the best of their economy, the agricultural base, and to thus prevent the traditional society from disappearing completely.

Kevin Kelly, the founding executive editor of Wired Magazine, will be the featured speaker this evening at an international conference titled “Amish America: Plain Technology in a Cyber World.” The title of Mr. Kelly’s presentation, scheduled for 7:00 PM Eastern Daylight Saving time, will be “What the Amish Can Teach (and Learn) from Nerds and Geeks.” The three-day conference will be held at Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA.

Kevin KellyMr. Kelly has maintained a personal interest in the Amish for more than 30 years. The abstract for his talk at the Plenary Session this evening indicates that he will explore “the collective steps that Amish communities use to evaluate their choices, test and experiment, tolerate loopholes, and prohibit or accept new technology, which provide valuable lessons for the fast-forward nerds and geeks.” His talk, plus four others during the conference, will be available for free live video connections via the conference website.

Kelly will go on to argue that the processes by which the Amish evaluate technology can be of more interest than the technologies they ultimately adopt. On the other hand, they themselves often don’t appreciate the benefits of technologies. He told a Lancaster newspaper that “short of an asteroid strike, there is no way civilization goes back.”

So even if modernity marches on, the Amish do too, he adds. He speculates, at least to the newspaper, that modern society might someday rely heavily on the Amish for food supplies. On the other hand, advances in silicon chip technology, as well as modern chemistry, have affected the Amish of Lancaster County. But they are the ones who make the choices to minimize their involvement with technology.

He has written that some Amish love to tinker and invent labor-saving devices, even while they shun entanglements with mainstream technologies. He calls their approaches, “Amish electricity,” when they use diesel powered, compressed air systems to run tools in their shops and, in some homes, refrigerators in the kitchens.

Another prominent speaker at the conference, which includes over 100 presenters, will be Karen M. Johnson-Weiner, from the State University of New York. She will speak at 10:30 tomorrow, Friday, on “A Tale of Two Kitchens: Gender and Technology in Amish Communities.” Her talk, which will also be available for live video feed from the conference website, will explore the ways Amish ideas about gender influence their acceptance of new technologies. At the same time, she will discuss how Amish adoptions of new technologies and attendant work habits affect their own notions of gender relationships.

Ms. Johnson-Weiner tells the Lancaster newspaper that some of the Schwartzentruber Amish in New York state take a harder line than most on the adoption of modern devices. “Not only do they not have cellphones,” she says, but “they will not even talk on a phone.” They believe in interacting without technology, which forces them to work closely with one another.

Another featured speaker will be Alan Shuldiner, a professor from the School of Medicine at the University of Maryland. His talk, at the end of the conference on Saturday, at 11:15, will be titled “Amish Participation in Medical Research: A Partnership of Trust and Mutual Benefit.” It too will be available to watch from the conference website.

The founder and director of the Amish Research Clinic in Lancaster County, Shuldiner will provide an overview of the ways the Amish accept medical technology, which is used in scientific research projects. He will discuss issues relating to Amish health, and their participation in medical research projects.

He told the Lancaster media that he first drove up to the Amish community in Pennsylvania in 1993 and began testing for diabetes out of his own car. He got to know the people and began building up mutual trust, which helped foster the medical research clinic. He said that there may appear to be a dichotomy, considering the Amish skepticism about technology, but he feels that such concerns are misplaced. Medicine does not actually threaten their culture.

Shuldiner concludes that the Amish “believe if they can participate in research, they can benefit all of mankind.”

In early May, the citizens of French Polynesia voted in a new president, an opponent of independence, prompting The Economist last week to weigh in on colonialism in the Pacific region. Tahiti is the most populous member of the Society Islands archipelago, which is the heart of French Polynesia. Throughout the Society Islands, people are generally referred to as “Tahitians” and were characterized, several decades ago, as being quite peaceful.

Oscar TemaruBoth major contenders for the position of President of French Polynesia, Gaston Flosse and Oscar Temaru, have occupied the president’s office before. Flosse is dedicated to the territory remaining closely tied to France, while Temaru has been repeatedly elected on a platform of ultimately achieving independence. The voters have elected one and then the other for nearly ten years.

Flosse, the new president, is a controversial 81 year old politician. He is currently at risk of serving time in a French prison for his conviction in January this year on charges of taking 1.2 million euros in bribes from 1993 to 2005. He was also found guilty in February 2013, in a separate case, where he was convicted on charges of embezzling money in a fake jobs scam.

Because of the appeals filed by his lawyers, he was allowed to participate in the election, which he won on May 5. Flosse also serves as a senator in France. His Tahoeraa Huiraatira party won 45 percent of the votes. Critics in France expressed their embarrassment at the outcome of the election. Flosse has often been charged with amassing his fortune by exploiting his political offices.

However, others say that the Polynesians themselves view the French courts simply as institutions associated with white settlers, so they don’t place much stock in court judgments. According to the political analyst Sémir al Wardi in Tahiti, “Gaston Flosse’s appearances in court do not have a significant sway on most voters.”

The UPLD coalition, the pro-independence party of Oscar Temaru, who was the president until being beaten by M. Flosse, won 29.26 percent of the vote on the 5th. A major reason for the defeat of President Temaru has been the declining economy in the territory. French Polynesia, with a population of 270,000, has seen unemployment rise to around 20 to 30 percent. One fifth of the people live in poverty.

Temaru has focused his career on achieving independence for the territory. He first won the presidency of French Polynesia in 2004 based on an independence plank in an election that was mired in controversy for months. Ever since, the office of President has revolved between him, Flosse, and Gaston Tong Sang, another politician.

M. Temaru has appeared to be getting closer to his goal in recent years. The French Polynesia Assembly voted in 2011 to petition the United Nations to have the territory placed on its list of nations that are still colonized. The election results in early May were widely viewed as a result of the economic problems of the territory, rather than as a vote against independence.

In comparison with other independent Pacific nations with comparable populations, however, French Polynesia is not doing too badly. The per capita annual GDP for the territory is almost $20,000, due in large part to financial assistance from France and the still vibrant tourist industry in the Society Islands. Other Pacific nations, by comparison, are not doing so well economically: Fiji has a GDP of $4,800, the Solomon Islands has a per capita GDP of $3,400, Vanuatu is $4,900, and Samoa is $6,200.

The article last Saturday in The Economist gave a different focus to the election results. The magazine pointed out that the United Nations did re-inscribe French Polynesia on the list of “non-self Governing Territories” by a vote on May 17th.

The article analyzes the issues involved with the UN listing by stating that independence is often not the preferred choice of many Pacific islanders. Tokelau narrowly failed to approve, by the required two-thirds majority, an independence referendum from New Zealand in 2006 and 2007. Pitcairn, home to 47 Bounty mutineer descendents, has no desire to achieve independence from Britain. Political leaders of American Samoa have asked that their territory should be removed from the UN list.

The issue in all of these colonies is one of economic survival. France has repeatedly indicated that any territory that votes for independence will lose its generous financial support. New Caledonia, which is rich in minerals, may well have an independence vote sometime in the next few years, a move that was agreed to by a French settler organization and an independence-minded indigenous group. Settler groups there who remain loyal to France hope that compromises can be reached that will allow them to remain under the French umbrella.

But, The Economist indicates, the Motherland might become weary of the whole issue—the costs of maintaining the colonial infrastructure and support systems in the Pacific keep rising. The magazine suggests that Mr. Temaru and the government in Paris may ultimately work out an independence arrangement that will be mutually acceptable.